ht+a's Podcast

[Audiobook] Personal Development | Adult Learning – Mental Skills

Subscriber Episode Hans Trunkenpolz + Associates Season 1 Episode 1

Subscriber-only episode

What if mastering the cognitive domain could transform your approach to adult education? Join us as we explore the innovative strategies behind Bloom's Taxonomy and its three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. We’ll unpack how educators can guide students from basic knowledge recall to higher-order thinking skills, sharing inspiring stories from educators like Elizabeth, John, and more. Discover how a solid knowledge foundation is crucial before diving into complex concepts.

Get ready to learn actionable techniques for enhancing logic, creativity, and critical thinking. From classroom debates to creating new procedures, we provide real-world examples and practical tips for implementing the higher stages of the cognitive domain. Hear about the challenges and success stories of educators like Angela, Blake, Samantha, Kate, Jeff, and Amy, and learn from Sarah's eye-opening experience as a substitute instructor. This episode is packed with insights that educators and lifelong learners won't want to miss.

Get In Touch.

Sign up for our self-paced courses or instructor-led workshops at www.ht-a.solutions

Sign up for our self-paced courses or instructor-led workshops at www.ht-a.solutions

Sign up for our self-paced courses or instructor-led workshops at www.ht-a.solutions

Speaker 1:

Adult Learning Mental Skills Module 1. Getting Started. Bloom's taxonomy is not just for elementary school teachers. The three domains of the taxonomy apply to adult education as well. In this manual, our focus will be on the cognitive domain. This is the domain of knowledge and intellect and it is the main focus of most educators. It is important to remember that the cognitive domain complies with the other domains of Bloom's taxonomy. Module 2. Bloom's Taxonomy.

Speaker 1:

Bloom's taxonomy has been a staple of educators for decades, particularly in the cognitive domain. Educators of both children and adults should be familiar with the theory's history and how it has changed over the years. A fundamental understanding of Bloom's taxonomy is essential, particularly when attempting to implement it in the classroom. The learning hierarchy is the focus of Bloom's theory. In the hierarchy, students master the basic stage of the learning domain before moving on to the next one. Like walking up a flight of stairs, students eventually manage to reach the top. As they master each level, they discover the ability to implement learning strategies and improve their skills. In this theory, teachers use the taxonomy to guide the students through to the higher levels of thinking and understanding. The three domains work together to create learning objectives, guide activities and develop effective assessments. Each domain identified is broken down into levels or categories, with specific behaviors, activities and example words that indicate when students have mastered skills from each level of the domain.

Speaker 1:

Benjamin Bloom was an education psychologist who, with other experts, developed a taxonomy of learning in 1956. The purpose of the taxonomy was to provide a framework of educational goals and establish their specific outcomes. Educators now had a rubric by which to measure learners' progress. The three domains that Bloom and his team discovered were cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The original taxonomy was the cognitive domain. That includes knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Other domains would follow later, including the effective domain in 1973 and the psychomotor domain in 1972. The original cognitive domain was updated by a student in 2000, which we will explore later. Lauren Anderson and David Cropville revised the taxonomy to be more action-oriented. The updated version removes knowledge, comprehension and evaluation and adds remembering, understanding and creativity. It includes remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating. Anderson and Kropel saw the limitation of the original theory and expanded on it, which we will explore in a later module.

Speaker 1:

The cognitive domain is most often associated with education because it is knowledge-based. The cognitive domain focuses on intellectual capability. The six levels of the domain move from the simplest at the bottom to the most complex at the top. Some educators, however, do not follow the prescribed order of stages. There is also some disagreement as to whether the original or the updated version of the domain is more effective. Situations that require more creative activities typically benefit from the updated version.

Speaker 1:

Elizabeth was planning to teach a course on emotional intelligence. She decided to focus on the higher levels of the cognitive domain, since her students were adults. Over the course of the program she discovered that the students were not retaining or understanding some of the more basic information. She consulted Scott, her business partner, and he told her that she was skipping over the base of the cognitive domain too quickly. They need to know and understand material in order to improve the higher order thinking skills.

Speaker 1:

Module 3. Knowledge. In the knowledge stage of cognitive domain, the focus is on memory. For students to be successful, they should be able to recall what they have been taught. Knowledge must be mastered before they can move on to comprehension.

Speaker 1:

Specific behavior, actions and examples that accompany the knowledge stage demonstrate mastery. The behavior of the knowledge stage is based on recognizing and recalling data. Students exhibit knowledge when they recite definitions, know rules and recognize processes In the workplace, recalling pertinent information, such as prices, is knowledge-based behavior. Knowledge is learned through actions that accompany behavior. Certain actions will demonstrate that students understand and implement ideas from the knowledge stage. Students who show the following actions are demonstrating mastery of the knowledge stage stage. Students who show the following actions are demonstrating mastery of the knowledge stage Read, search online, take multiple choice test, use study aids.

Speaker 1:

This list is not comprehensive, but it is appropriate for students of all ages, including adult learners. These actions should align with the example words that are used to determine learning outcomes. Familiarity with example words will help expand your understanding of the knowledge stage of the cognitive domain. Keywords are used to define learning outcomes. These example words are active verbs that teachers use in their objectives and goals for the class. These example words help educators assess performance and determine what level of mastery students have reached. The different domains work together, so you will see overlap in examples between them. Commonly used keywords for the knowledge stage of the cognitive domain include know, memorize, repeat, describe, list, define, state, match, select, label, outcomes, begin with action verbs that help define performance measurements.

Speaker 1:

When implementing the learning objectives at the knowledge phase of the cognitive domain, the goal is to design activities that help students demonstrate the learning objectives created In adult learners. This requires providing accurate resources and directions, such as books, aids and lecture. This stage includes facts, concepts, principles and procedures that are relevant to the subject taught. Be practical in the instruction and do not overwhelm them with too much information at one time. Pace instruction, because overwhelmed students will not be able to retain the knowledge. John took over an adult writing class. He began by asking the students to tell him where they were in the class and if they needed him to review anything. He spent the first class reviewing what should be common knowledge. This late in the class, after the lesson, he contacted his supervisor. Ellen explained that the previous instructor had expected too much from the students and treated them like they were in an upper-level college course. He was going to have to take the students back to the basics for them to be successful.

Speaker 1:

Module 4. Comprehension. The second step of the cognitive domain is comprehension. Once students have gained knowledge, the goal is for them to comprehend what they know. It is important to be familiar with the behavior, actions, example, verbs and implementation necessary to support students in their progress through the comprehension stage of this domain. Behavior in this stage should indicate that the students are able to focus on their own understanding of the information presented. At this point, the students will demonstrate that they have moved beyond simple memorization to complete understanding of the information and data being imparted. Students will respond in different ways as they move through this phase of the domain Reword, interpret, reason, translate.

Speaker 1:

There are certain actions that will indicate students are achieving success in the comprehension stage. These actions require the students to show only a low level of understanding of the subject matter. Examples of actions that demonstrate the student's comprehension Create examples of information, give solution to problems, interpret the meaning of texts, provide treatment ideas. These are not all the possible actions, but they are a good start. These actions should align with the example words that will be used with learning outcomes. Being familiar with example words will help better your understanding of student responses. The keywords, or example words that describe how students respond at this level of the cognitive domain, are used to create learning objectives and to describe and assess students' performance. These example words include convert, estimate, theorize, infer, paraphrase, predict and rewrite. When establishing keywords, it is important to use action verbs.

Speaker 1:

When implementing the learning objectives at the comprehension phase of the cognitive domain, the goal is to design activities that help students gain personal understanding. Adult learners will require that activities be designed with their skills and needs in mind. An example of effective implementation would be asking students to take notes and tell stories. Cooperative learning techniques with small groups all benefit learning. Comprehension Essay tests are useful evaluation techniques that show student comprehension.

Speaker 1:

Ed and Claudia chose to teach a course in basic physics. They worked together preparing lessons. Once the class began, ed noticed that the students did not seem to understand the material. Claudia was pleased that the first test had a decent curve and did not see the trouble. Ed, however, saw that students were capable of recall information, but they could not understand or apply it on their own. When he looked at the tests, he convinced Claudia to wait to move forward with the skills Module 5.

Speaker 1:

Application. In the application stage, students will begin to apply general or abstract ideas to real-world scenarios. The students will use the information that they learn in class and outside of it. At this point the students go beyond general understanding to the specific implementation. Remember, at this stage students focus on a general use and application, not complex analysis. At the application stage, the student behaviors change and they begin to implement the general information that they have learned. These behaviors indicate that the students are able to apply information on their own and exercise any theories that they have acquired. For example, an employee who uses an instructional handbook to guide the process of completing paperwork properly is applying general data to a specific action. Remember, at this stage students focus on a general use and application, not complex analysis.

Speaker 1:

The actions that show clarity at the application stage are based on ideas, theories and principles that the students know and understand. The actions commonly associated with application are identify the parts of a process, demonstrate qualitative assessments Able to deconstruct processes, measure needs or requirements, evaluate reliability. These are not the only actions that demonstrate student application, but they are typical examples. The keywords should align with the actions and the learning outcomes. Being familiar with example words will help your understanding of application's actions and is necessary for evaluation when students display application abilities in the cognitive domain, example words or key words will help identify successful mastery. These terms are used in teacher objectives to assess performance. These example words include Solve, use, construct, respond, modify, show, apply, discover. When using keywords with goals and lesson planning, it is necessary to start with action verbs, which makes actions and behaviors clear. When implementing the learning objectives at the application phase of the cognitive domain. The goal is for students to act on their knowledge. Activities that are group-based are beneficial for demonstrating application. Additionally, students have the opportunity to demonstrate application when they are able to practice or participate in the guided creation of objects. Adult learners are more likely to apply knowledge when it relates to their goals, work or interests, so try to make any activities relevant to your students.

Speaker 1:

Adam was responsible for leading a course on roadside safety. He is not excited and read through the mandatory information as quickly as possible while everyone follows along with their books. At the end of the course, he hands out a brief scenario quiz to evaluate understanding. The results were disappointing. Only 52% answered accurately. The rest were unable to apply the information. His friend, gwen, pointed out that the class was not interactive and students only had the opportunity to apply knowledge at the end.

Speaker 1:

Module 6. Analysis. Analysis builds on knowledge and application. At this stage, students are able to break down content and recognize relationships. Analysis is closely related to synthesis and evaluation and must be mastered before the students complete the domain. Specific behaviors, actions and examples accompany the analysis stage to demonstrate mastery.

Speaker 1:

In the analysis stage, students build upon application to move towards interpretation. They should be able to understand how the different aspects of a topic relate to each other and interpret the connections in a logical way. This interpretation includes Elements, principles of organization, structure. Their behavior should also reflect their ability to analyze and logically view the quality and reliability of components. The actions in the analysis stage display the ability to identify logical relationships. These actions would include identify process parts, deconstruct methods, qualitative assessments of relationship parts, measure needs, measure requirements, qualitative assessments of values, troubleshoot, recognize misconceptions. The list of actions is not complete, but they are commonly used. The keywords and learning outcomes should align with the actions of the analysis stage.

Speaker 1:

Being familiar with example words will expand your understanding of analysis and recognize behaviors that students express. Example words or keywords are terms that predict and show how students display analysis in the cognitive domain. They are used in teacher objectives to determine and assess performance. These example words include quantify, measure, graph, value, deconstruct, infer, separate. When using keywords and goals in lesson planning, it is important to begin with action verbs so that it is obvious when students are mastering the analysis level of the cognitive domain.

Speaker 1:

When implementing the analysis stage of the cognitive domain in class, you must require the students to practice logic skills. An example of implementation from this stage would be having a group of students engage in debate. Troubleshooting equipment would also improve analysis skills. The focus of the analysis stage is making sure that students understand the difference between what is inferred and what is factual. The subject of the instruction will determine the best implementation techniques to be used. Angela and Blake taught a beginner's course together. Angela wanted to focus on teaching the basic concepts and terminology. She argued that they could save money by not requiring all students to use computers and increasing the class size. Blake pointed out that they needed the opportunity to perform hands-on activities in order to perform analysis effectively. Even at the beginning stages of the process, she agreed to keep the class the same for the sake of student success.

Speaker 1:

Module 7. Synthesis, analysis and synthesis work together in the cognitive process. Analysis is the ability to break down information logically, but synthesis is the ability to take the parts and make them into a whole. Students need to master both to be successful. Successful mastery is shown in the behavior and activities that students demonstrate both inside the classroom and outside the classroom. Once students understand and develop analysis skills, they will be able to develop synthesis behaviors. They will demonstrate behaviors that include creative thought. Their behavior will show that they can create new and distinctive ideas out of original concepts, structures, systems, models, ideas, approaches, operations. The behavior that shows synthesis will use many various elements in creation and have either a unique structure or meaning.

Speaker 1:

The actions in the synthesis level display consistency, will show creativity and the learner's ability to complete projects. Actions that demonstrate synthesis include create solutions, develop procedures, integrate new methods, build teams, make new protocols, design objects, revise processes. The list of actions is not all-encompassing, but they are commonly used in a good starting point. The list of actions is not all-encompassing, but they are commonly used and a good starting point. The keywords and learning outcomes will align with the actions of the synthesis stage. When you are familiar with example words, you will expand your understanding of synthesis and recognize actions associated with this stage. Example words or keywords are terms used to depict how students show mastery of synthesis in the cognitive domain. These keywords are used in teacher objectives and learning domains to help teachers evaluate and assess performance. At this stage, the focus will be on completion and creativity. Examples of keywords include develop, plan, build, formulate, integrate, design, compile, modify, reconstruct. These are just a few keyword examples. When developing keywords, remember to make sure that you use action verbs.

Speaker 1:

At the implementation stage. Students are developing creativity and new ideas. Without promoting creativity, it is not possible to develop synthesis skills. For example, asking students to revise something would connect application and develop synthesis. Developing networking and essay construction skills would also help implement synthesis in the classroom. The important thing to remember at this stage is that students need opportunities to grow and develop their creative skills. Samantha and Kate were teaching a class for the new system covering the employee time, leaves and absences. They had to move quickly and showed students how to operate the basic information, so they presented the information using a screen to display actions. Two weeks after implementing the new system, 40% of users made user errors. Although they had been shown the basic skills, they could not think to implement them unless they were exactly like the example shown.

Speaker 1:

Module 8. Evaluation. Evaluation is at the top of the original cognitive domain. It is a stage in the domain that is not included in every class. The stage, however, is included in doctoral programs. Instructors at the evaluation stage need to be very careful because it is not easy to measure success at this point. The behavior and actions, however, will give clues to the student achievement. At the evaluation stage, it is important to understand that students will be able to use qualitative assessments themselves. The goal at this stage is to judge the value of different resources and concepts. Behaviors that indicate that students are exercising evaluation include critical thinking, evaluate effectiveness, assess external criteria, compare and review strategically. Students who demonstrate these behaviors will do so.

Speaker 1:

After building on the synthesis stage of the domain, at the evaluation stage, students will engage in numerous actions. Since this is the pinnacle of the domain, you will see it include and expand on actions of the previous stages. Actions will reflect the students' abilities to make the best decisions and discover solutions. These actions include Review of strategic options, conduct sustainability ROI, evaluate sustainability, calculate and defend finances, perform risk analysis, complete SWOT analysis. At the point of evaluation, the students will act in a way that demonstrates their ability to act independently in the decision-making process.

Speaker 1:

Example words or keywords are terms teachers implement to establish when students master evaluation in the cognitive domain. These keywords are typically found in teacher objectives and learning domains, but they are effective in different methods of assessment. Examples of keywords include justify, defend, review, report, conclude, critique, appraise. This is not a complete list, but it is a good start. When developing keywords for examples, remember that action verbs are necessary. The implementation of the evaluation stage of the cognitive domain is more complex than other stages. There are, however, ways to implement learning of evaluation in the classroom. Evaluation is enhanced when students have the ability to use reports and case studies and also work in small groups. Surveys and papers will also improve skills in the evaluation phase. At this stage the students will show more expertise in their abilities than they have in earlier domains with the same exercises and their abilities than they have in earlier domains with the same exercises.

Speaker 1:

Jeff and Amy were teaching a debate course. Jeff divided the class into teams and a rivalry developed. Amy soon discovered that students debated more from emotions. They did include some facts and information in their topics. For the most part, however, the arguments lacked careful evaluation. She and Jeff discussed ways to encourage students to fully evaluate topics before arguing their points of view. They decided to rotate teams to encourage logical thought and evaluation.

Speaker 1:

Module 9. Updated Version. The cognitive domain of Bloom's taxonomy was updated by Bloom's student Lauren Anderson, as well as David Crotwell in 2000. The new version of the domain employs a more active view of learning and also employs verbs rather than nouns to label the stages. The changes need to be noted to determine which method would be most effective. Knowledge noun is now referred to as remembering verb. In remembering, the student is expected to recall information. The stages are almost identical, but remembering asks the student to focus more on active memory rather than the ability to find data. Recitation is an example of remembering, as is the ability to recall facts and other data. Understanding verb replaces comprehension noun in the updated domain. Again, it is very similar to the original phase.

Speaker 1:

In each, students demonstrate their ability to extract meaning. The original domain focuses on the material in general, whereas understanding is extracting meaning from different functions, including activities and written material. Applying is the equivalent of application. Again, they only have minor differences related to the activity. In applying, students are able to apply what they have learned. In applying, the students implement procedures. The information in this instance also includes situational learning through different techniques such as simulations and presentations. The original analysis is the ability to break down components while analyzing, and also breaking down objects into parts to understand how they relate. The actions that are associated with analyzing include organizing, differentiating, attributing and distinguishing. These are specifically mental actions that are used when creating graphs, charts and diagrams.

Speaker 1:

Evaluate replaces synthesis in the updated version of the cognitive domain. In the original domain. Evaluation is the judgment of value whereby students made decisions using criticism based on standards. Originally, it was a process that could be seen reports, recommendations and demonstrations. According to the updated cognitive domain, it is necessary to develop evaluating skills before effective creation, known as synthesis. In the original cognitive domain, creating changes places with evaluating and is similar to synthesis. With synthesis, the students combine parts to create new resources. In the creation stage, the students put the parts together to generate a whole through reorganizing, generating, producing and planning. In creating, the students must put parts together in a way that is unique, not a reproduction of what already exists. According to Lauren Anderson and David Kropfahl, this is the most complex stage of the cognitive domain.

Speaker 1:

Liz taught a creative writing class. She implemented the original cognitive domain in her lesson plans. During the course of her class, she noticed that the students were often better at evaluating statements and making judgments than they were at producing unique and individual content. After speaking with another teacher, ryan, she considered following his example. He used the updated domain because it is active and lists creativity at a higher stage.

Speaker 1:

Module 10. Types of Knowledge. Bloom's original cognitive domain identified three different types or levels of knowledge. These were factual, conceptual and procedural. The updated domain added a fourth level the metacognitive. Understanding these levels of knowledge and their differences is necessary for implementing the cognitive domain.

Speaker 1:

Factual knowledge is the information that students must be familiar with in order to problem-solve or use to become familiar with their field of study. There are subtypes associated with factual knowledge, according to the theory by Anderson, including details, symbols, elements and terms. Factual knowledge includes basic facts. For example, the American presidents, parts of the anatomy or the musical works of a composer are all examples of factual knowledge. At the conceptual level, the students focus on concepts and ideas. The elements of larger structures and how they operate should be recognized. At this level, students see the interrelationship and how each element works together. The recognized subsets include principles, classification, categories, theories, generalization and models. Examples of this knowledge would include the theory of gravity, time periods or models of government.

Speaker 1:

The procedural level of knowledge is where students know how to do things. At this level, the students develop inquiry methods, skill criteria, techniques, methods and algorithms. The established subtypes are algorithms, techniques, skills methods and judgment criteria. At this level of knowledge, students should be able to engage in literary criticism. Procedural knowledge would also be able to create art and analyze. The added knowledge level is metacognitive. This level of knowledge is defined as being cognizant of general and personal cognition. This final stage includes the following subtypes self-knowledge, learning strategies and knowledge of cognitive-related tasks. Examples of metacognitive knowledge are the use of organizers, mnemonic devices and understanding of personal motivation. Knowledge are the use of organizers, mnemonic devices and understanding of personal motivation.

Speaker 1:

Peter and Janet were leading computer certification classes. Peter decided to use the original domain and all of its components. His students did well, but the students in Janet's class appeared more motivated. They personally connected with the instruction and were very self-aware. As a result, more students earned certifications and twice as many went further in their training. Peter asks Janet about her class and she told him she paid close attention to the metacognitive domain, module 11.

Speaker 1:

Training the training in the cognitive domain requires careful planning and implementation. This is where familiarity with the teaching models and assessments comes in handy, making it easier to complete plans and improve success. This is a beneficial introduction that you should build on in the future. There are examples of different teaching and training models and concepts that can be implemented in the cognitive domain to improve understanding at separate phases. Memory model move students through the sensory stage with relevant information to short-term memory. Chosen information is placed in long-term memory Concept models. There are different concept models, but they focus on teaching concepts and using tools such as concept mapping. The number of training examples is extensive. The important thing to remember is that students should be met at their skill level with relevant information.

Speaker 1:

Problem solving is higher in the cognitive domain. There are typically four different stages of problem solving. These are identify the problem, discover possible solutions, look at solution alternatives, evaluate and choose. Problem solving should be modeled and is particularly effective in research projects and experiments. Qualitative assessments are effective in establishing student progress and are implemented in the cognitive domain, where students should know how to practice them. Qualitative assessments are more inductive than deductive. Methods of qualitative assessments that can be implemented in the classroom include observation, focus groups, interviews, documentation. When employing qualitative assessments, you must develop the criteria for evaluation.

Speaker 1:

Lesson plans help establish the objective and work towards goals in education. The information from the domain establish the objective and work towards goals in education. The information from the domain, including actions and keywords, will help guide the creation of plans. A typical lesson plan uses a matrix and there is more than one way to create a lesson plan matrix. The goal of the lesson should be established and used to guide the planning matrix. Example Cognitive level objective strategy.

Speaker 1:

Sarah was filling in for an accounting instructor at work. She was not sure how long she was going to be there, but she already decided not to use Roy's lesson plans. She also failed to create her own. The students did not move in a steady progression. By the time Roy returned the next month, the students were two weeks behind. He was frustrated with Sarah and asked her help in catching up the class Module 12. Wrapping Up Although this workshop is coming to a close, we hope that your journey to learning about adult learning, mental skills and the cognitive domain is just beginning. We wish you the best of luck on the rest of your travels.

People on this episode

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.